June 2003 -- Volume 7-- Number 5 -- newsletter@truste.org
 


 
MAY TOP 5 PRIVACY STORIES
 

1. Web Site Privacy Seals: Are They Worth It? (Computerworld - May 8, 2003)

  2. Who's Fighting Spam--the Report Card (ZDNet - May 15, 2003)
  3. New Privacy Regulation to Take Effect July 1 (Entrepreneur - June 11, 2003)
  4. Senate OKs Consumer Privacy Bill (Los Angeles Times - May 30, 2003)
  5. Upper House Panel Approves Controversial Data-Protection Bills (Japan Times - May 22, 2003)

Late-Breaking News
As of July 1, a new California privacy law will affect any organization that electronically stores personal information on California residents.
»Learn More

Knowledge You Need
Do you have clients in the European Union? Here's what you need to know about the EU Safe Harbor program.
»Learn More

Roundtable
Industry leaders discuss their experiences with TRUSTe's EU Safe Harbor seal.
»Learn More

Leading Edge
TRUSTe's new Bonded Sender program protects valid email messages from being deleted by spam filters
. »Learn More

Privacy Resources
This U.S. Department of Commerce Web site is the best resource for information on Safe Harbor.
»Learn More

Stay Current!
Privacy and security events around the world -- and new privacy innovation awards.
»Learn More

TRUSTe Tech Tip
How to judge when you need to notify your clients about changes to your privacy statement.
»Learn More

Welcome New Licensees
The newest Web sites to display the TRUSTe seal.
»Learn More

 


New California Privacy Legislation Affects Businesses Across the United States

On July 1, 2003, a new California privacy law with wide-sweeping implications takes effect. California Senate Bill 1386, passed in November, will require any corporation or nonprofit organization that electronically stores personally identifiable information (PII) on California residents -- no matter where the organization is based -- to notify the public in the event of unauthorized access to that information.

The law is written broadly enough that "unauthorized access" to an organization's network does not just mean hacker attacks but also internal breaches of security, benign or criminal. The legislation is designed to slow the growth of identity fraud, an increasingly common crime in the Electronic Age.

The effect on businesses nationwide is yet unknown. All companies that store information such as clients' bank accounts, credit card numbers, and even driver's licenses will need to secure and closely monitor their networks for any evidence of unauthorized access.

TRUSTe is currently working on developing reasonable security guidelines for licensees. Look for them in the fall.

 
 


EU Safe Harbor at a Glance
by Stephanie Lim

In October 1998, European Union Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC went into effect across all 15 member states of the European Union. Known colloquially as "the directive," the law regulates the collection, use, storage, and transfer of any personally identifiable information (PII) regarding EU citizens, including both customer and employee data. As part of the directive, all EU organizations maintaining a PII database are required to register with government data protection authorities and to disallow data transfers to countries outside the EU with inadequate data protection policies.

With $379 billion worth of trade between the United States and the EU each year, most of which is dependent on the exchange of sensitive information, the directive has massive consequences for U.S. businesses. To prevent U.S. companies from unwittingly breaking EU laws regarding the transfer of PII out of the EU into the United States and from being subjected to large fines or disruptions in commercial transactions, the U.S. Department of Commerce created a "Safe Harbor" self-certification process. By self-certifying as an EU Safe Harbor-compliant company, organizations can satisfy the "adequacy" requirement for transferring PII out of the EU.

Most U.S. organizations that handle any sort of PII regarding EU citizens must adhere to Safe Harbor guidelines, provided that the organization is subject to the jurisdiction of a recognized government body. As of yet, only two U.S. government bodies have been recognized by the European Commission (EC): the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)and the Department of Transportation (DOT). Although it may seem counterintuitive, organizations like banks and insurance carriers are not eligible for Safe Harbor certification since their sector-specific regulations have not as of yet been deemed adequate by the EC.

In general, the privacy principles governing the directive are similar to those governing current FTC Fair Information Practices and, consequently, TRUSTe privacy seal programs. However, while organizations may currently enjoy the lax domestic laws regarding privacy-related infractions, companies in violation of the directive will have to answer directly to the EU data protection authorities.

At a June 2003 conference on Safe Harbor certification sponsored by the U.S. Department of Commerce and TRUSTe, Miriam Wugmeister, a privacy attorney at Morrison & Foerster, said to participants, "Let me tell you why most large, multinational organizations are considering becoming a safe harbor. It's a uniform approach across Europe . . . and onward data transfers are facilitated." Wugmeister reported that enforcement of the directive is increasing, facilitated by the 50 Safe Harbor enforcement officials that the EU recently hired. Fines for improperly sharing data, even with a subsidiary organization, or for public disclosure of information can reach as high as 1.08 million euros (US$1.3 million).

The directive also carries some surprising exceptions with it. It is information-specific, meaning that companies may choose to certify only the portions of their database that are subject to Safe Harbor requirements, such as human resources data. Additionally, while it is typically unacceptable to deny U.S. citizens access to their own PII, there are many situations in which an organization has the right to deny this access under the provisions of the Safe Harbor framework. A company can even charge a fee to grant access to individuals' information.

TRUSTe has worked with the U.S. Department of Commerce and other regulatory agencies to develop its Safe Harbor Seal program, ensuring that companies who receive the Safe Harbor Seal are in full compliance with Safe Harbor standards. Qualifying for the TRUSTe seal also satisfies the verification and dispute resolution requirements. For more information on the TRUSTe EU Safe Harbor Seal, contact Michelle Lucas at mlucas@truste.org.

 

 
 


Privacy Officers Discuss TRUSTe's EU Safe Harbor Seal Program
by Stephanie Lim

A quick glance at the Department of Commerce's Safe Harbor Web site (see "Privacy Resources" below) may incite panic in some privacy officers, but the Safe Harbor self-certification process is necessary -- and much more manageable than it may seem. To date, 46 companies, with 106 URLs, have certified themselves as EU safe harbors with TRUSTe's EU Safe Harbor Seal. Penalties for failure to comply with the EU directive are so severe that some organizations that do not handle personally identifiable information (PII) are choosing to certify simply to dispel fears of both current and potential investors. The current TRUSTe Safe Harbor Seal holders are typically U.S. companies that maintain PII regarding employees or consumers residing in the EU.

Kathleen Helm, director of service center operations at Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) International, said that TRUSTe was "very helpful" throughout the Safe Harbor certification process. "AFCEA is an international association whose membership includes residents of the EU," said Helm. "In order to comply with EU directives, AFCEA needed a third-party verifier of its privacy policies to implement a membership portal. TRUSTe was listed by the Department of Commerce as one of the organizations that could meet this need."

Privacy officer Eleonora Romagnoli of Cribis Corporation, an information services firm, said that although she found the certification process to be longer than expected, Cribis was able to complete the process with minimal legal counsel simply by following TRUSTe's Safe Harbor guidelines. In addition to the accessible framework provided by the seal program, she feels that TRUSTe's high level of brand recognition presents a further element of confidence to EU citizens. "TRUSTe's EU Safe Harbor Seal is famous in Europe. It has the quality to certify our compliance to the EU directives about privacy policy."

Paola Dovera, portal content manager for Sybase, Inc., said that Sybase has taken extra measures to ensure compliance with the EU directive by establishing a privacy officer in the EU. "Sybase is concerned about working to establish and maintain worldwide privacy standards," she said. "TRUSTe was the easiest choice [for ensuring Safe Harbor compliance] as we had already established a relationship via the [standard] online privacy certification."

Organizations that handle large amounts of consumer data have to take extra steps when determining which data must be certified. Harris Interactive, a global market research and consulting firm, had to pay close attention to detail when mapping its data collection processes, but found that its current standards were already adequate. Lynn Siverd, chief privacy officer for Harris Interactive, said, "given that we operate with a confirmed registration process . . . and provide opt-out capabilities in each of our communications to our registrants as well as the ability to modify their personal data, we were essentially already compliant with the EU directives."

Equally important, each of these organizations has developed education programs to train personnel involved in data collection and storage processes about the EU directive.

For more information on the TRUSTe Safe Harbor Seal, visit www.truste.org/programs/pub_harbor_join.html or contact Michelle Lucas at mlucas@truste.org.

 
 


Bonded Sender: A New Method for Improving Spam Filtering
by Colin O'Malley

If you thought you've been receiving too much spam lately, watch out, because the problem is only getting worse. According to major network ISPs, the volume of spam their users have received has more than doubled since the beginning of the year -- and it's only June.

As the volume of spam continues to grow exponentially, the costs associated with the problem -- including consumer frustration, lost productivity, and bloating IT budgets -- are growing just as quickly. TRUSTe considers spam to be one of the most important privacy challenges on the Web, and we have significantly increased our activity in this area over the last year.

The latest initiative in our ongoing effort to add trust and accountability to email is Bonded Sender, a product that we are slated to launch with IronPort Systems in July.

Bonded Sender provides legitimate email senders with a way to be recognized as good players in the industry and in return to receive an assurance that ISPs will honor their status by giving their emails preferential treatment in the filtering process.

One recent survey estimated that 15 percent of legitimate email (about one in six messages) is being routed away from consumer inboxes due to overzealous spam filtering. The deleterious effects of "false positives" are difficult to overstate for any business that relies on email for marketing or customer relationship management.

How does Bonded Sender work? Senders agree to abide by a TRUSTe-certified set of baseline standards in email, and they back up this pledge with money -- an amount proportional to the volume of email they send. Incremental amounts will be debited from this "bond" if consumer complaints exceed normal thresholds. The complaint rate also provides an ongoing feedback mechanism that empowers consumers to vote against unscrupulous mailers.

The financial mechanism provides an ongoing, real-time assurance to TRUSTe and to ISPs that senders will behave ethically. Once senders complete the certification process, they designate specific outbound mail IP addresses as "bonded" IPs. ISPs and other network operators can identify incoming mail from bonded IPs with a standard DNS query.

The current filtering tools used by major ISPs are tuned as sensitively as possible, and anyone with an inbox knows that plenty still gets by. As filters are broadened to catch more suspect email, the incidence of false positives also increases. One vendor recently tested adjustments to its spam filtering technology that produced a 15 percent increase in the spam "catch rate" -- and raised the rate of false positives by 10,000 percent. By identifying legitimate mailers, Bonded Sender allows spam filters to be further fine-tuned without the trade-off of increasing false positives.

We at TRUSTe recognize that there is no silver bullet to kill off spam. But Bonded Sender is a self-regulatory approach with a sound, underlying technical basis that can go a long way in ensuring that good email is delivered.

If you are interested in participating in the Bonded Sender program, or if you have any questions, please let us know right away. We're still accepting sender applications for the upcoming launch. If you represent an ISP or a network and you are interested in more information about the adjustments necessary to accept "bonded" mail, we'll be happy to review the details with you.

Colin O'Malley has recently joined TRUSTe as a product manager focusing on anti-spam and email trust initiatives. If you would like to participate in licensee research on email, please contact Colin at colin@truste.org.

 
 


U.S. Department of Commerce Safe Harbor Site
The Department of Commerce oversees certification and enforcement of the Safe Harbor program, so their Web site is the number-one resource for organizations interested in becoming Safe Harbors. Not only does the site provide an overview of Safe Harbor and post all the formal EU and U.S. documents setting out its parameters, the DOC provides step-by-step instructions for bringing a company's privacy policy in line with the program and completing the online self-certification process. Plus, a complete list of companies participating in the Safe Harbor program is updated regularly.

 


Here are a few upcoming conferences and workshops around the world -- and a call for nominations for online privacy awards.

Seventh Annual Internet Law Institute

New York: July 14-15, 2003

San Francisco: July 28-29, 2003

Overview: Every year the country's leading practitioners, corporate counsel, and business executives gather at PLI's Internet Law Institute to examine key issues in Internet law; hot copyright issues such as peer-to-peer litigation, ISP and third-party liability, the use and misuse of trademarks on the Internet, building and managing an IP portfolio in a down economy, online payments, and Web-services outsourcing do's and don'ts. For complete details, visit PLI's Web Site.


25th International Conference on Data Protection and Privacy

Dates: September 10-12, 2003

Location: Sydney, Australia

Overview: Business leaders and privacy professionals from around the world will be gathering in Sydney this September to meet with key decision-makers in the Asia-Pacific region and to hear about international privacy regulation, implementation, and the privacy needs of consumers. With the theme of "Practical Privacy for People, Government, and Business," sessions will focus on technologies, marketing and relationship building within a privacy framework, compliance, and consumer advocacy. To learn more about the conference or to register online, visit the conference Web site at www.privacyconference2003.org.


Call for Nominations: TPG Privacy Innovation Awards

The Technology Policy Group (TPG) at Ohio State University's Fisher College of Business has announced the creation of the HP Privacy Innovation Awards. The first annual awards will be presented at TPG's 5th annual PrivacyCon in Columbus, Ohio, on October 1, 2003. They will recognize commercial and government/nonprofit organizations for integration of privacy protection throughout the organization's business processes. Criteria for the award include the impact of the organization's privacy protection policies on the protection of customer privacy, innovation in developing metrics of effectiveness, and marketing or business advantages realized through the implementation of privacy protection.

Online entry forms and additional information, including details about PrivacyCon 2003, which TRUSTe is cosponsoring, are available through August 18 at http://www.privacyinnovation.org. TRUSTe licensees are eligible for a discount on PrivacyCon2003 registration. For the TRUSTe password, please call Michelle Lucas at (415) 618-3402 or George Mamashiani at (415) 618-3403.

 
 


Tech Tip: Every time you make changes to your company's privacy statement, you must determine whether they constitute a "material change" requiring you to notify all site users.

The TRUSTe certification guidelines stipulate that companies must provide "notice and choice." This means that users should be made aware of the current use of their personally identifiable information (PII) and be given choice for unrelated uses or sharing with third parties. Therefore, if you make a change to the privacy policy that changes the way PII is handled, you must let users know about this material change so they can choose whether they want to continue sharing their PII with you. If you fail to follow proper notification procedures you may invalidate your TRUSTe certification.

Here is a list of four questions that you and your staff should ask yourselves when making a change to the privacy statement. Distribute the list to your division heads so they can engage in fact-gathering before proposing changes to the statement.

  1. Does this change affect notice, use, security, or integrity of PII?

  2. Does this change refer to a new function of the Web site or a new technology that will be associated with PII in a way that is not already disclosed in the statement?

  3. Does this change affect only new users or users already in your system?

  4. Does this change affect the method by which you will notify users about material changes?

If you answer "yes" to one or more of these questions, review your privacy statement to determine the procedures you have spelled out for just such an occasion. Then contact your TRUSTe account manager. He or she can help you answer any questions about material changes and about the associated notice and choice process.

-- Robert Behrens, JD, Senior Account Manager and Internet Privacy Specialist

 
 


TRUSTe would like to congratulate the following new licensees on successfully completing our certification process:

Ande Jewelry & Mineral, Avatar Group, GDSX, Logitech, Nationwide Insurance, Solidbill, US Websitebuilder, Vertigo Online, and Walker Information.

 
 


Got Feedback?

We would like to hear what you think of the TRUSTe Advocate. Send an email with your comments and suggestions to newsletter@truste.org.

TRUSTe is an independent, nonprofit organization that administers the Internet's first and largest privacy seal program.

685 Market Street, Suite 560
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 618-3400
Email: info@truste.org
Web: www.truste.org